A heart larger than life

13.03.11_Slavoj Zizek_A heart larger than lifeBy Slavoj Žižek.

Para a versão em português do artigo, clique aqui.

I must confess that, more often than not, I did not like what Hugo Chávez was doing, especially in the last years of his reign. I don’t mean the ridiculous accusations about his “totalitarian” dictatorship (to people who claimed this, I would advise a year or two in a real Stalinist dictatorship!). But yes, he did many crazy things. In foreign politics, one cannot excuse his friendship with Lukashenko and Ahmadinejad; in economic politics, a series of badly improvised measures which, instead of really solving problems, rather consisted in throwing money at them to cover them up; mistreating political prisoners and deserving a rebuttal from Noam Chomsky himself; up to – last and least – some ridiculous cultural measures like prohibiting Simpsons on TV.

But all this pales into insignificance compared with the basic project he was engaged in. We all know that, in today’s global capitalism with its spectacular but deeply uneven development, there are more and more people who are systematically excluded from active participation in social and political life. The explosive growth of slums in the last decades, especially in the Third World megalopolises from favelas in Mexico City and other Latin American capitals through Africa (Lagos, Chad) to India, China, Philippines and Indonesia, is perhaps the crucial geopolitical event of our times. Since, sometime very soon (or maybe, given the imprecision of the Third World censuses, it already happened), the urban population of the earth will outnumber the rural population, and since slum inhabitants will compose the majority of the urban population, we are in no way dealing with a marginal phenomenon.

These large groups  are of course one of the favored objects of humanitarian care and charity for the liberal elites – recall emblematic images like the one of Bill Gates embracing a crippled Indian child. We are constantly solicited to forget our ideological divisions and do something about it – even when we go to Starbucks for a cup of coffee, we learn that we already are doing something, that a part of the price we pay goes for Guatemala children or whatever.

But Chávez saw that this is not enough. He saw the contours of a new apartheid on the horizon. He saw what was once class struggle re-emerging in the guise of new and  even stronger divisions. And he did something here. He was the first who not only “took care of the poor” in the old populist Peronist style, to speak for them, but seriously put all his energy into awakening them and effectively mobilizing them as active and autonomous political agents. He saw clearly that, without their inclusion, our societies will gradually approach a state of permanent civil war. Remember the immortal line from Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane, when Kane, accused of speaking for the underprivileged against his own class, answers: “If I don’t defend the interests of the underprivileged, somebody else will – maybe somebody without any money or any property and that would be too bad.” This “somebody else” was Chávez.

So while we hear the prattle about Chávez’s “ambiguous legacy,” about how he “divided his nation,” when we expose him to an often deserved criticism, let us not forget what it all was about. It was simply about the people, about the government of, for, and by the people. All the mess was the mess created by the difficulty of realizing such a government. With all his theatrical rhetoric, in this Chávez was sincere, he really meant it. His failures were ours.

There is an illness, I heard, when heart – as organ – simply grows too big and cannot function properly, unable to pump all the blood through its widened veins. Maybe Chávez really died of having too big a heart.

***

All of Slavoj Žižek’s books published in Brazil by Boitempo are avaiable in ebook form. If you’re interested, find out more in the links below:

Revolution at the Gates: Lenin – The 1917 Writings * ePub (Livraria Cultura |Gato Sabido)

The Parallax View * ePub (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

Welcome to the Desert of the Real! * ePub (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

In defense of Lost Causes * ePub e PDF (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

First as Tragedy, Then as Farce * PDF (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

Living in the End Times * ePub (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

The Year of Dreaming Dangerously * ePub (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

Also, there’s an article by Žižek on Boitempo’s Occupy: Protest Movements that Took the Streets (along with David Harvey, Mike Davis, Tariq Ali, Immanuel Wallerstein and others) * PDF (Livraria Cultura | Gato Sabido)

***

menos que nada_capa_altaSlavoj Žižek’s new book, Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Historical Materialism has just been released in Brazil.

Slavoj Žižek is in Brazil to take part in an International Seminar on Marx, together with David Harvey, Michael Heinrich and many other renowned marxist thinkers!

***

Boitempo Editorial is one of the most prestigious independent leftist publishers in Brazil: a publishing house of radical thinkers from the classics of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Leon Trotski and Vladimir I.U. Lenin to György Lukács, István Mészáros, Slavoj Žižek, Alain Badiou, Giorgio Agamben, Perry Anderson, David Harvey, Mike Davis, Fredric Jameson and Tariq Ali. Among the Brazilian authors, Boitempo publishes some of the greatest leftist intellectuals of our time, such as Emir Sader, Leandro Konder, Franscisco de Oliveira, Maria Rita Kehl, Michael Löwy, Ricardo Antunes, Paulo Arantes and Vladimir Safatle. For Foreign Rights, visit our website or contact blog@boitempoeditorial.com.br.

7 Respostas para “A heart larger than life

  1. Reblogged this on Senselogi© and commented:
    Zizek on Chavez: A heart larger than life

  2. Pingback: A heart larger than life | CriticAtac

  3. Pingback: An anthology of articles on Hugo Chavez, perhaps the greatest leftist of our times | GPJA's Blog

  4. Pingback: Famorac's Blog

  5. Beautiful article, but with some misconceptions, specially in the first parragraph. There are no political prisoners in Venezuela, the case Zizek refers is one corrupt judge -María Lourdes Afiuni- that allowed a corrupt banker -Eligio Cedeño- to scape prison and seek “political” asylum in USA. He is actually there.

    Also, there was NO ban on the Simpsons, the TV channel that broadcast that show was prompted by CONATEL (a venezuelan state office which goal is to watch for a responsible use of TV) to change’s Simpsons time of the day to show.

    My conclusion? International media is so STRONG that even an intellectual and anticapitalist militant as Zizek, can sometimes fall under its spell…

  6. Pingback: Remembering Chavez: Tribute to a Bolivarian Revolutionary |

  7. “…in the old populist Peronist style, to speak for them, but seriously put all his energy into awakening them and effectively mobilizing them as active and autonomous political agents.”
    I strongly disagree. Having actually lived in Venezuela and seen, first hand, how his government worked, his interest was not in “mobilizing them as active and autonomous political agents”. There was nothing autonomous about his movement. It was all, 100% top down, autocratic rule. And the folks at the top (starting from the Chavez family) made themselves filthy.stinking.rich. And promoted policies that would keep themselves in power.
    If you are REALLY interested in seeing this side of Chavismo, the internet is rife with videos of him personally attacking heartfelt criticism from his own followers. And, who can forget the photo of his youngest daughter with a wad of dollar bills? (or just google the names of his other daughters, you will find great photos of them shopping in expensive malls or hanging out with celebrities, like Justin Bieber).
    I think he only seems like a nice guy with a big heart when you aren’t one of the hundreds of thousands of poor Venezuelans who died at the hands of violent crime during his 15 years in power. (yes, 15… would you feel happy if the current government of your western country changed the constitution and allowed the president to run indefinitely?)
    It is also interesting to see how Zizek does not lump Chavez with other world figures like Soros or Gates or Starbucks. One the one hand, he is part of a global cartel that keeps oil prices artificially high (in the process affecting the poor everywhere), but on the other he is this great humanitarian?

Deixe uma resposta

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do WordPress.com

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta WordPress.com. Sair / Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Google+

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google+. Sair / Alterar )

Conectando a %s